Woman accused of having sex with a dog as part of 'dark web' child sex ring
Add Reply
Bow Wow Harris
2020-09-20 05:08:21 UTC
Two people have appeared in court accused of playing a role in a
"dark web" child sex ring.

Maria Alfonzo, 31, is also accused of having sex with a dog in
Alnwick , Northumberland.

Co-defendant Caroline Scurr also faces multiple child sex
allegations, reports ChronicleLive.

All the alleged offences are said to have occurred this year.

They, along with a third defendant Simon Mallen, are accused of
arranging or facilitating the commission of a child sex offence.

Neither female defendant entered a plea at South East
Northumberland Magistrates' Court. Their co-accused, Mallen, was
not present.

Scurr, 42, of North Shields, remained largely silent throughout
the 20-minute hearing, only speaking to confirm details
including her address.

Alfonzo, who gave her nationality as Venezuelan, appeared via
video link.

She faces a separate charge of allowing sexual penetration by a
living animal, namely a dog.

Alfonzo, whose last listed address was Kingskerswell, in Devon,
was remanded into custody.

Magistrates granted Scurr conditional bail. Her conditions
include having no contact with any child under 16.

Both defendants will next appear at Newcastle Crown Court on
January 8. The court heard the case has been reserved for Judge
Christopher Prince.

2020-10-10 20:03:54 UTC
Post by Bow Wow Harris
Two people have appeared in court accused of playing a role in a
"dark web" child sex ring.
Post by Bow Wow Harris
Alfonzo, who gave her nationality as Venezuelan, appeared via
video link.
She faces a separate charge of allowing sexual penetration by a
living animal, namely a dog.
So... these supposedly moral legal lawyers who write legislation and judge have
NOOOOOO legal intelligence at all.

While animal cruelty certainly cannot be allowed to stand, would you abuse a human
who abused an animal? And yet, under the herein quoted notion, someone who has
sex with a _willful_ animal is insulted, offended, assaulted, violently attacked,
assailed, criticized, what you call it.

This is criminal insanity, and those who practice are hired killers, lead by crazy
people. They are obviously to be condemned and damned as murderers, by all
intelligence and holy thought.

So while two wrongs, don't make a right. And two errors, don't make a right. This
woman, on this point, did no wrong.

The notion, that you can be murdered, for something that's right, is the real big
deal here.

Like stoning people for working on the Sabbath day, this is unholy doctrine, and
false religion. This sort of disease infects Christian Countries and Muslim
Countries, alike, as there is female genital mutilation in some stone-age African
Christian Countries. And it is perpetrated as religion.

As there was no place for the Jew, in the American Colonies. If you denied Christ
three times, they put you to death. Yet who denied Christ three times, Peter the
first Pope. They're so stupid, they don't read their own religion. These
politicians are 100% incompetent to kill us. Christ raised the dead. Believe!

"I raised the dead by knowing that life is an eternal attribute of everything that
the living God created.
I understand that miracles are natural, because they are expressions of love."
- Jesus Christ, A Course in Miracles, Chapter 4, Section 4 (5pdf)

"The emptiness engendered by fear must be replaced by forgiveness. That is what
the Bible means by "There is no death," and why I could demonstrate that death
does not exist. I came to fulfill the law by reinterpreting it. The law itself,
if properly understood, offers only protection. It is those who have not yet
changed their minds who brought the "hell-fire" concept into it.
I assure you that I will witness for anyone who lets me, and to whatever extent he
permits it. Your witnessing demonstrates your belief, and thus strengthens it.
Those who witness, for me, are expressing, through their miracles, that they have
abandoned the belief in deprivation in favor of the abundance they have learned
belongs to them."
- Jesus Christ, A Course in Miracles, Chapter 1, Section 4

Post by Bow Wow Harris
Matt 12
At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the Sabbath. And His disciples
were hungry, and began to pluck heads of grain and to eat. 2 And when the
Pharisees saw it, they said to Him, “Look, Your disciples are doing what is not
lawful to do on the Sabbath!”

3 But He said to them, “Have you not read what David did when he was hungry, he
and those who were with him: 4 how he entered the house of God and ate the
showbread which was not lawful for him to eat, nor for those who were with him,
but only for the priests? 5 Or have you not read in the law that on the Sabbath
the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath, and are blameless? 6 Yet I say to
you that in this place there is One greater than the temple. 7 But if you had
known what this means, ‘I desire mercy and not sacrifice,’ you would not have
condemned the guiltless. 8 For the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.”
Healing on the Sabbath

9 Now when He had departed from there, He went into their synagogue. 10 And
behold, there was a man who had a withered hand. And they asked Him, saying, “Is
it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?”—that they might accuse Him.

11 Then He said to them, “What man is there among you who has one sheep, and if it
falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will not lay hold of it and lift it out? 12 Of
how much more value then is a man than a sheep? Therefore it is lawful to do good
on the Sabbath.” 13 Then He said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” And he
stretched it out, and it was restored as whole as the other. 14 Then the Pharisees
went out and plotted against Him, how they might destroy Him.

Mark 2
23 One Sabbath Jesus was going through the grainfields, and as his disciples
walked along, they began to pick some heads of grain. 24 The Pharisees said to
him, “Look, why are they doing what is unlawful on the Sabbath?”

25 He answered, “Have you never read what David did when he and his companions
were hungry and in need? 26 In the days of Abiathar the high priest, he entered
the house of God and ate the consecrated bread, which is lawful only for priests
to eat. And he also gave some to his companions.”

27 Then he said to them, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.
28 So the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.”

Mark 3
Another time Jesus went into the synagogue, and a man with a shriveled hand was
there. 2 Some of them were looking for a reason to accuse Jesus, so they watched
him closely to see if he would heal him on the Sabbath. 3 Jesus said to the man
with the shriveled hand, “Stand up in front of everyone.”

4 Then Jesus asked them, “Which is lawful on the Sabbath: to do good or to do
evil, to save life or to kill?” But they remained silent.

5 He looked around at them in anger and, deeply distressed at their stubborn
hearts, said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” He stretched it out, and his
hand was completely restored. 6 Then the Pharisees went out and began to plot with
the Herodians how they might kill Jesus.

Luke 14
Now it happened, as He went into the house of one of the rulers of the Pharisees
to eat bread on the Sabbath, that they watched Him closely. 2 And behold, there
was a certain man before Him who had dropsy. 3 And Jesus, answering, spoke to the
lawyers and Pharisees, saying, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?”

4 But they kept silent. And He took him and healed him, and let him go. 5 Then He
answered them, saying, “Which of you, having a donkey or an ox that has fallen
into a pit, will not immediately pull him out on the Sabbath day?” 6 And they
could not answer Him regarding these things.

Ref, also, Luke 6:1-10, Luke 13:10-17

Deuteronomy 5:, Old Testament
12 ‘Observe the Sabbath day, to keep it holy, as the Lord your God commanded you.
13 Six days you shall labor and do all your work, 14 but the seventh day is the
Sabbath of the Lord your God. In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor
your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your ox, nor
your donkey, nor any of your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates,
that your male servant and your female servant may rest as well as you. 15 And
remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt, and the Lord your God brought
you out from there by a mighty hand and by an outstretched arm; therefore the Lord
your God commanded you to keep the Sabbath day.

Numbers 15, Old Testament
32 Now while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man
gathering sticks on the Sabbath day. 33 And those who found him gathering sticks
brought him to Moses and Aaron, and to all the congregation. 34 They put him under
guard, because it had not been explained what should be done to him.

35 Then the Lord said to Moses, “The man must surely be put to death; all the
congregation shall stone him with stones outside the camp.” 36 So, as the Lord
commanded Moses, all the congregation brought him outside the camp and stoned him
with stones, and he died.

before Jesus, the 613 Commandments of Moses were already reduced but to one: "the
just shall live by faith."

"Now the just shall live by faith;
But if anyone draws back,
My soul has no pleasure in him.”
Hebrews 10:38

"But that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident, for “the
just shall live by faith.” Galatians 3:11

"For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God to
salvation for everyone who believes, for the Jew first and also for the Greek. For
in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith; as it is written,
“The just shall live by faith.”
- Paul the Apostle, Romans 1:16-17, Holy Bible, New Testament, NKJV

“Behold the proud,
His soul is not upright in him;
But the just shall live by his faith.
Habakkuk 2:4, Old Testament

"For I desire mercy and not sacrifice,
And the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.
Hosea 6:6, Old Testament
2020-10-10 20:53:38 UTC
One can't rightly have sex with an unwillful prisoner, nor a mentally incompetent
toddler. And then it's that one took somebody's kids skydiving, without their
knowledge, but it's really the kid's personal choice.

A child's right to sexuality is as sacrosanct as a child's right to Church. It
would more, at most be, that one couldn't hang out with them anymore, as far as
this warden-ward Parental tyranny is allowed to persist.

Pedophilia is less deviant than gay or beast. Pedophilia is akin to interracial.
When you prohibit something you give someone a complex.

People who harm the weakest among us incite the most outrage. If you were going
to take vengeance, you would start with those who torture puppies and children.
But it wouldn't undo the evil done. Yet at the same time, much of the persecution
of pedophiles is reminiscent of the persecution of homosexuals, and even
interracial sexuality. There are still people to this day, who say that
homosexuals are psychopaths, and have a mental disorder. They make the same
claims about pedophiles. That some homosexuals are psychos in fact, that some
pedophiles have murdered children, that some adult heterosexual men, want to have
sex with dead girls, is no acceptable stereotype of 90%-99%+ of the rest of the
population. Whatever percent that is. For the rest of the people who have no
such interest, and it is certainly far above 90%. Most people respect human
rights, yet not those who persecute pedophiles, homosexuals, and black men who
just 50 years ago, they hung from a tree for having sex with a white woman.

For the record we fully condemn child abuse. And in the strongest terms possible.
In case anyone is wondering.

But there is nothing more criminal about having or distributing pictures and
videos of children having sex, than there is about having or distributing
nonsexual pictures and videos of children abused, which they distribute on the
nightly news and on Youtube both, as evidence of a crime.

Rather child porn laws are suppressing just such evidence of a crime. I have
heard from law enforcement, that in addition to happy consent child sex videos,
there are toddler rape videos. Toddlers screaming for their mothers, evidence of
a crime hidden from the public eye. This is the greatest atrocity, an abominable
offense to suppress activity that ought to see the light of day, as all evidence
of crime ought not be shrouded in darkness.

You don't have to be pedo, or homo, or have sex with other races. You're just not
against people who do; so long as no one is victimized. We're not guilty by
doctrine. But those persecuting others by doctrine, are guilty, by fact. Actually
two wrongs don't make a right, any more than three do. But truth and error exist
as scientific moral facts.

On the other hand, according to all just and right legal theory, you don't have to
be interage prejudice either. It's like someone saying you can't have sex with
someone from Canada, and threatening to kill you if you do. Then you say people
who have sex with Canadians have a mental disorder. It's not like every
interracial couple is a fetish couple. Prejudice is abhorrent.

But the right points of criticism against pedophiles, are: 1) You can't have sex
with an unwillful prisoner, any more than a police officer can tell someone to
have sex with them, and do so, and 2) You can't have sex with a mentally
incompetent toddler.

And then it's that one took somebody's kids skydiving without their knowledge, but
it's really the kid's personal choice.

So I was trying to figure out, if like the person said "yes" to the prison guard,
would the prison guard still be in jeopardy if the person later said, they just
said "yes" cause they were afraid. Yet the law, "de jure," does not even admit
the possibility of consent, which is a fact, but says the act is criminal "per
se," which makes the law criminal.

Saying children can't consent *is* a lie.

I'm not a pedophile. I just don't like to see my innocent countrymen murdered.

People saying minors can't consent, are making the same mistake as people saying
minors have to consent; and people saying minors have to consent, are making the
same mistake, as people saying minors can't consent. Both persuasions are
abhorrent. Both parties need to be corrected. Because someone had sex in the
past, doesn't mean they wish to repeat it today. Minors are liable to be slut
shamed and pressured into blaming their partners, and slut shaming is wrong. This
doesn't excuse actual tyrannical influence of a warden-ward relationship. And
obviously mentally incompetent toddlers cannot consent.

And then it's that one took somebody's kids skydiving without their knowledge, but
it's really the kid's personal choice, and sacrosanct right, as it is the kid's
sacrosanct right to go to Church. Many teens meet the other kid's dad before
taking their sexual/romantic interests out on a date. But at the moment,
apparently the law wouldn't care if pedos had their young friend's parent's
blessings. Again, warden-ward tyranny aside. Kids in child porn deserve their
pay as much as movies stars and kids in underwear commercials.

No, I'm not making child porn. No, I'm not a pedo. In fact, I've never even seen
it, and have just heard reports from law enforcement, about toddlers screaming for
their mothers while being raped.
2020-10-10 20:54:28 UTC

2020-10-10 20:55:15 UTC
1. Beastiality
2. In Public
3. Interage
4. Prostitution
- though prostitution is a service like being a maid, and produces no equity
(you could be a maid, for a house before sale, or hotel or apartment before
Porn produces equity.
5. Incest

that's it.